Civil War & Human Agency
Free Men Don't Ask
My Thoughts
Thinking about my future in the world and the responsibilities that are generally expected of the young, and future most of us will be forced to endure, has me horrified, and hopeful.
The challenges our generations have been handed are by no means impossible to solve, but are also to date, the most complex and demanding set of problems the human race has ever seen. We’ve been handed crumbling societies unwilling to protect natives in favour of political theatre, dating markets that reward parasitic and highly transactional behaviour, and institutions that once held us up and supported us left hollowed out and twisted against us. Housing markets the have well and truly passed the statistical inequality found in periods of human history where serfs and peasants were legitimate social classes.
I’m literally competing with imports for work and housing, and told to accept it as normal and not at all completely treasonous. We find ourselves on the business end of a compound growth equation with our currencies and inflation, for most of us the basics afforded to even our older siblings, let alone our parents, is out of reach and will remain so until something is done.
All across the world right now, things have been brewing for hundreds of years to a violent and depressing climax. Many my age (25), will be wondering how the world and their very much, seemingly-not-first-world country, has gotten there. What has taken place over the last 50 years will in time, become one of the most vivid examples of how not to run societies in future, how important the concept of God and unity with a whole is, and how insanely authoritarian our societies have become under the Baby Boomers.
The West’s defensive capacity has been eroded by a century-long campaign of ideological subversion (Marxism - The Fight of Our Time). After the Industrial Revolution dislodged Christianity from our cultural lives, growth of governments from world wars, movements like feminism, the Vietnam War, gay rights, and those inflaming historical racial wounds were co-opted by Marxist infiltrators to subvert native culture and stifle resistance. By vilifying, oppressing, and silencing masculinity and martial traits like firearms and honour, and manipulating groups like scared young women and unprotected gays, these forces fracture social capital and cohesion, fostering low trust societies, leaving us vulnerable to division, loss of sovereignty, and a completely new age of Artificial Intelligence-powered centralized digital control—all of this is a spiritual disease.
I believe, a period of global and civil war, and a precipitous collapse in living standards and birth rates will ignite a spiritual struggle, much like the Black Death birthed Renaissance humanism, and the French Revolution sparked liberalism. This carnage and suffering will be the resistance against which, a new foundational spiritual codex in which the West will renew it’s cultural, creative, spiritual, and moral vitality, will emerge.
Cause and Effect
Under the Biden administration, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. and its Western allies swiftly excluded key Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging system for international payments and froze approximately $300 billion in Russian central bank reserves held in Western financial institutions. This unprecedented weaponisation of the dollar-based global financial order not only aimed to cripple Russia’s war machine but also accelerated global de-dollarisation efforts, sealing the long-term fate of U.S. dollar hegemony by eroding trust in the currency as a neutral store of value.
After his 2024 re-election, President Trump escalated tariff wars to counter global de-dollarisation and reassert U.S. dominance. In April 2025, he used emergency powers to impose a 10% tariff on all imports, with 30% on EU goods and up to 60% on Chinese exports, raising the average U.S. tariff from 2.5% to over 18% by mid-2025. These measures aim to deter trading partners from abandoning the petrodollar system by punishing economic decoupling. Yet, as empires clash in this trade Colosseum, the tariffs risk pushing the world further away from U.S. dominance, many facing retaliatory fire from China and the EU, inflating costs for American consumers and hastening the very multipolar world order Trump vows to forestall. The world wasn’t going to make it pretty for them to gain their manufacturing independence back, as in a gruelling war of attrition, foreign powers inflate prices as to batter American consumers, betting that public discontent will force a U.S. surrender and usher in a fragmented global hierarchy - they’re right.

Geopolitically we enter a period of history where countries once safely under the Pax Americana military umbrella now scramble to reassert fundamental sovereignty in resources, macroeconomics, and defence and its industrial base. With said military industrial bases moving with devastating speed towards drones, automated systems, cyber and EW capabilities, and most frighteningly, Artificial Intelligence (AI).
The Status Quo
Evil people have seized every single cultural institution in the West and they’ve turned them into factories that produce one product, and that is a hatred of you and your ancestors, hated for the very fact you exist, and they call this Social Justice. I, and others, call this as it is, a psychological war against native westerners fought with lies and propaganda, designed to take your culture, your rights, your wealth, your land, and eventually the Westerner all together.

We live in the most centralised financial and business systems in the world, in history. In Australia our tax system really is, one touch... because they already have ALL of our financial data. If I try to go to the bank and withdraw more than a few thousand of my own dollars they won’t give it to me without a legitimate reason. I can ask to be paid in cash but they won’t.
I’ve seen consent ads from my government, far-right internet warning ads, and recently the Victorian state government made an ad with the line ‘Trans and gender diverse people deserve to feel safe’ with the ad heavily encouraging women to just take the hit for the team and accept it as normal.
Modern governments are steam rolling towards Digital ID and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC), many of which have been explicitly warned not to by the constituents, have had these plans continue regardless. The U.K. had a formal petition to parliament with 2.9 million signatures, my country Australia hasn’t come any near voting on Digital ID and the Digital ID Act 2024 still passed. The system our elite overlords essentially want us to move towards is similar to China. Constant surveillance, digital tracking of everything, people who don’t behave can be completely isolated from society while being in the middle that very society. They lose access to jobs, the ability to bank, get housing, transport, ID/licenses etc... The system they want the West to endure is designed fundamentally to keep the humans inside it, at a level of survival thinking so they can be controlled in fear, its designed to make sanctions (like the West sanctioned Russia or Iran) possible at the individual level. Businesses will throw workers under the bus, family members will turn on each other, marriages will be worked open. There is no bond this system cannot break - it is fundamentally powered by dehumanisation. I believe a system like this, and what it produces, to be the end villain of industrialisation. As Nietzsche wrote more than one hundred years ago, we’re in the era of the last man. The last man being the archetypal passive nihilist, people that only seek comfort and security over struggle, and self-overcoming.
The Chairman of Palantir, Peter Thiel, one of the very few Silicon Valley companies that has dared enter into a moralistic realm such as defence contracting, recently spent an hour with a New York Times reporter, in which he spent most of the interview evaluating the theological and metaphysical implications of the anti-Christ.
Yes, you read that correctly: the man who chairs the company, named after the sinister all-seeing crystal ball from The Lord of the Rings, has a fascination with autonomous drone technology and domestic surveillance software, as well as a keen interest in Satan.

Now I could write out a nice long conclusion to all that, but I’ve got the wisdom and charisma to say it in a better way...
I’ve experienced a lot of rather silly shit, and my life couldn’t possibly be more invaded by this cult of Marxist-Globalists. I believe the world is on the cusp of evils much larger, more intimate, and higher resolution than we saw in the 20th century.
The industrial revolution changed how humans lived their lives so seriously that it completely shattered our need for formal religions, life was getting better everywhere, you didn’t need to pray to God because things were going really well. Nietzsche preached this in his time as God is dead, and we killed him. However, the 20th century, when looked at abstractly, was a battle between two pathways of belief that humans saw as the way we should operate our societies. This gained material wealth, improved lifespan and health, allowed for a more diverse platform of political beliefs. During the French Revolution, all politicians that could fall into progressive left-wing types would sit together on the left of the chamber, and all the traditionalists, monarchs, and clergy would sit together on the right - our political beliefs could broadly be split into two factions of thought we now colloquially refer to as Right and Left.
Leftism
From modern psychology and sociological trends, we observe that four key correlates of someone leaning left-wing include: they live in a city, they are university educated, they have low or no agency at work, and they are female. Other conservative writers and content creators have mentioned this before me, but the infamous UNABOMBER, Ted Kaczynski, in his political manifesto, gives what I and others believe to be the most accurate definition of political leftism - it is the reaction to the dehumanisation of the industrial revolution, of the industrial world - modernity.
Theodore Kaczynski was tested as a child to have a 167 IQ (take from this what you will), allowing him to skip grades, entering Harvard at age 16 as a mathematics prodigy, where he participated in a three-year psychological study tied to the CIA’s MKUltra program, partly linked to the CIA’s research into brainwashing, the paranormal, and psychedelics. Involving intense abusive interrogations designed to break down participants’ egos through humiliation and verbal attacks. This experience fuelled his 17-year bombing campaign against symbols of modern industrialisation to compel the world to confront his ideas. During his bombing campaign he managed to get his political manifesto published in The Washington Post and The New York Times, called, Industrial Society and Its Future. We get the name UNABOMBER from the FBI filename UNABOM meaning University and National Airline Bomber. During his PhD in 1966, he experienced a brief but intense phase of gender dysphoria, feeling strong feminine urges that led him to book, and ultimately cancel, an appointment for sex-reassignment surgery in San Francisco. I believe this to also be a marker of deeper trauma, likely including sexual assault from the program’s torment, this is also just speculation.

In the manifesto, Kaczynski meticulously unpacks leftism not as mere ideology, but as a profound psychological affliction born from the Industrial Revolution’s erosion of human autonomy—the “power process” that once allowed individuals to pursue self-directed goals through effort and risk. He identifies two core drivers: an acute “feeling of inferiority” manifesting in hypersensitivity, victim identification, and a visceral hatred of anything evoking hierarchy or objective truth (like science or competition), and “oversocialization,” where rigid conformity to societal norms breeds crippling guilt and a desperate quest for collective validation.
Here are some snippets from his manifesto, its a very enlightening read (everything bold is my addition):
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
9. By “feeling of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
10. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms ‘negro,’ ‘oriental,’ ‘handicapped’ or ‘chick’ for an African, An Asian, a disabled person or a women, originally had no derogatory connotation. ‘Broad’ and ‘chick’ were merely the feminine equivalents of ‘guy,’ ‘dude’ or ‘fellow.’ The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word ‘pet’ and insist on its replacement by ‘animal companion.’ Leftist anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word ‘primitive’ by ‘nonliterate.’ They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive culture ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftist anthropologists.)
11. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problem of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems.(We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE inferior, we are only making a point about leftist psychology).
12. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by the fear that women may NOT be as strong and capable as men.
13. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilisation, they hate white males, the hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilisation. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
14. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc. play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
To distil that for you dear reader - political leftism, stems from a moral malaise—a frustration born of powerlessness to enact meaningful personal change. Probably why modern academics are the most left-wing of all of us - they have no control over what they teach, how much they get paid, where they work, how long they work, who they teach to, and they have no status from this either. All they have is jealousy and resentment for the people who can, which also comes into the general hate for conservatives in the modern West. They have God, family, community, and values, they just don’t need a central authority to survive and thrive. Carl Jung warns that without acknowledging and reconciling this fuller God-image—which embodies evil as a necessary counterpart—societies risk “psychic possession” by destructive archetypes, as seen in the rise of Nazism, where repressed pagan gods like Wotan fuelled mass fanaticism and horror. Jung described this as a historical pendulum swing: the more we “rationalise God out of existence” through secularism or incomplete theology, the more the unconscious floods back with compensatory violence, creating a “nightmare” of collective evil.
The mechanism of psychological projection is key here. As humans, we’ve repressed so much of our shadow selves that we can no longer recognise them in ourselves. This is evident in the modern Left: Democrats and their allies rail against fascism and label Trump as Hitler precisely because, on a subconscious level, they recognise their own fascist, Nazi-like, transphobic, sexist, racist, and xenophobic tendencies. They’re the ones pushing policies that force men into women’s bathrooms, importing masses of low-wage workers to dilute American identity and labour value like modern-day slaves, aligned with the groups ripping down statues and other cultural institutions, and dismantling the industrial base for profit—yet they project these very evils onto their opponents to avoid self-confrontation. The banality of evil lies in this refusal: everyone must suffer because they won’t acknowledge that they aren’t the best people, move forward and try and improve. The Democrats are a good example, but rest assured, they are like this everywhere in the Western world.
I think a lot of our societal movements right now are just the equal-and-opposite force, they are cope for these very real issues that have been structurally exacerbated and/or ignored. Humans need Mate, Meaning, and Work to survive and thrive, and all of these have been structurally ignored and stunted. We’ve experienced a large decay in religiosity, the marriage rates have collapsed all over the Western world, and we’ve exported manufacturing overseas (90% of the working classes income was manufacturing). I believe the fracturing of our cultures is an exploration of the solution to these problems: The rise of anti-natalism (in all varieties), tiny houses, homesteading, the gig economy, rise of veganism and vegetarianism, experimental sexualities, digital nomads, minimalism, fandom obsessions, the term incel, emergence and explosion of OnlyFans, rise of vapes, growth in conspiracy mindedness, and most obviously the rise of suicide and deaths of despair.
People in my life might perceive me to be too blunt or uncaring when talking about sensitive issues, but to me, that’s when accuracy and measured intention is the most important, its when things get real that people need something firm and real to hold on to, no matter how unpalatable. Now these issues might be unfair, they might be evil to their core, they might be nasty and inhuman, but at the end of the day, Darwinian theory plainly states: natural selection favours the strong and weeds out the weak.
This is evolution at work, unapologetic and inevitable. It’s not about the issues, its about your ability to move past them. e.g. I gather a large pool of women in the next couple decades won’t reach safe family set-ups and likely children, and similarly a large pool of men will reach deteriorating health and realise they don’t have enough in them physically in the current financial environment to attain the same thing. From a Darwinian lens, it will have meant they failed, and that’s an ugly truth - no one is coming to save you.
In a Pew Research report in 2020, they found approximately 44% of U.S. women aged 18-49 were childless.
It’s getting there in the other Western countries too.
Lying by Omission
In his 1928 book Propaganda, nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays, argued that an “invisible government” of elites (including journalists and advertisers) should engineer consent to maintain social order. He rebranded “propaganda” as the more palatable “public relations,” but the goal was the same: control the narrative, omit the inconvenient truths, and sell ideologies. Bernays’ techniques—staged events, planted stories, and psychological nudges—became the backbone of how press barons and governments alike wielded newspapers as tools for influence, often tilting the scales toward progressive causes.

The western press for almost as long as they have existed have played partisan with leftist ideologies, often shielding regimes and other interest groups from scrutiny, while amplifying every perceived flaw in the right (Traditionalists, Monarchs, Priest-class etc...). In the seminal work Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, they explain in detail why the press favours leftist regimes, and the effective mechanisms, called filters, that stop specific issues being used or published. These filters are inherent to the mechanism of press.
- Ownership - Who owns them?
- Advertising - Where do they get their income?
- Official sources - Where do they get their information? Reporters and Journalists all around the world are pretty expensive... maybe just send one to the Government press meeting.
- Flak - Who’s toes do we avoid, to keep doing what we need to do?
- Marginalising Dissent - Anyone that is a problem gets the ‘Fascist’ or ‘Communist’ label.
Concentrated corporate ownership aligns coverage with global capital, downplaying socialism’s threats to profits while excusing “friendly” authoritarianism (e.g., China’s surveillance as “savvy governance”). Advertising pressures favour sanitised narratives to avoid losing progressive consumers. Sourcing from official channels and embedded experts creates echo chambers of regime apologists, omitting dissidents and atrocities like the Gulags as mere “excesses.” Think about it, most news today they literally just repeat what the politicians say, they are supposed to take that information, and then investigate it to find the truth. Flak from leftist NGOs and academia punishes critical deviations, while an evolved “anti-fascist” filter shields leftism’s failures under moral relativism. Together, these manufacture consent for a status quo where leftist horrors stay buried, sustaining the illusion of Western moral exceptionalism.
For the Flak and ‘anti-fascist’ filters, think the response author J.K. Rowling got for gender-critical tweets, left-leaning NGOs like GLAAD and Amnesty International publicly condemn her as ‘transphobic,’ urge boycotts of her work and pressuring publishers to distance themselves, effectively weaponizing Flak. The ‘anti-fascist’ filter can be seen in the riots following George Floyd’s death, Antifa and allied activists framed widespread looting and arson as ‘anti-fascist resistance,’ downplaying the violence as a necessary response to a ‘fascist police state’ allowing media sympathisers to bury the $2 Billion in property damages and the eroded public trust.

It becomes pretty obvious, if you get bashed, robbed, or someone close to you get raped by a black bloc Antifa goon, watch your city be torched and pillaged, and you see the media and state say nothing about it or outright deny it. The press don’t care, they actively hate you, if you look for it you can see the palpable disgust they have for normal people (non-woke, and the western man), you cannot trust them, don’t. Antifa are their goons, they are the modern secret police. They will radicalise a generation, and with the internet, you can watch the radicalisation in real-time:
All Lipstick; No Lips
The modern West has also intentionally picked very poor heroes relative to the stock of people they could look up to. Most of the people the left has posited as moral heroes are anything but, its no surprise they hate the West’s actual heroes, they couldn’t come close in 10 lifetimes:
- Karl Marx (1818–1883): The prophet of communism behind Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto lived parasitically off Friedrich Engels while fathering an illegitimate son, Freddy, with his housekeeper—abandoning the boy to poverty as a factory worker. Three of his seven children died young from malnutrition in London’s slums; daughter Laura later committed suicide in a pact with her husband.
- Nelson Mandela (1918–2013): The anti-apartheid saint whose 27-year prison term became a badge of victimhood was arrested after police found him linked to bomb plots via Umkhonto we Sizwe, the ANC’s armed wing—leading to his 1964 life sentence for sabotage conspiracy in the Rivonia Trial. He beat and cheated on first wife Evelyn, treating her poorly amid abuse allegations, and was a neglectful dad to six children (three dying young), with daughter Makaziwe lamenting, “He was not there as a father.”
- Che Guevara (1928–1967): The poster-boy guerrilla of Castro’s revolution oversaw brutal executions at La Cabaña prison in 1959, ordering firing squads for “counterrevolutionaries” without trials—including teens and officers. A homophobe, he sent gays to labour camps; a neglectful father to four kids across relationships, his diaries reveal elitist disdain for the proletariat he claimed to champion.
- Mahatma Gandhi: The non-violence icon who led India’s independence abused wife Kasturba—slapping her, yanking her hair over religion, and forcing her to scrub toilets—while shaming her illiteracy. His “celibacy experiments” included sleeping nude with young followers like grandnieces; early in South Africa, he segregated Indians from “uncivilized” Black Africans.
- Susan Sontag (1933–2004): The leftist essayist who branded whites “the cancer of human history” was seduced at 17 by her 28-year-old professor Philip Rieff into a hasty marriage—birthing son David at 19 before ditching them for Oxford and NYC stardom, neglecting the boy amid accounts of her cold disinterest. Later bitterly regretting the entrapment and “flabby adulation,” her repressed feelings leaked as continual resentment; a bisexual slammed as “pathologically immoral” by ex-lovers, her elitism poisoned intimates.
- Mary Wollstonecraft: The feminist pioneer of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman abandoned her firstborn, Fanny Imlay—born out of wedlock during a French Revolution affair—to a wet nurse in France at age two. Shuttled between guardians, Fanny suicided at 22 with a laudanum overdose, her note pleading, “Let no one follow me.” Wollstonecraft’s later family suppressed the scandal.
- Simone de Beauvoir (1908–1986): Author of The Second Sex, the ur-text of feminism, she groomed female students for sexual “pacts” with Jean-Paul Sartre, passing them like property—one, Olga Kosakiewicz, seduced at 19 as her pupil, left emotionally wrecked. Dismissing marriage and motherhood as enslavements, she had no children, ending bitter and isolated.
- Gloria Steinem (b. 1934): The glamorous Ms. magazine co-founder and 1970s feminist face secretly funnelled CIA funds to disrupt communist youth festivals in Europe—exposed in the 1970s, clashing with her radical image. She admitted exploitative affairs with married men, including a Hollywood producer tryst that commodified her without regret.
- Margaret Sanger (1879–1966): Planned Parenthood founder and birth control crusader laced her vision with racism, advocating sterilisation of the “unfit” (poor Blacks, immigrants, disabled) in Woman and the New Race. She partnered with the KKK in 1926 and interned Japanese Americans for “racial hygiene”; her chaotic marriages left children neglected, with son Grant dying young from instability.
The Looney Bin
The strength of a person’s spirit would then be measured by how much ‘truth’ he could tolerate, or more precisely, to what extent he needs to have it diluted, disguised, sweetened, muted, falsified.
Friedrich Nietzsche
These realities for many of us, were legitimately once vague and hateful conspiracy theories discarded as insane and not relevant. The Great Replacement is just the reality for much of Europe and the U.K. right now.

I want to present a couple pages from a book called Behold a Pale Horse by William Cooper, you can believe it or not, that’s fine, but I’m bringing these materials up, because things like this exist. People that think like this exist - never forget that, because you live amongst them.
The last image, is the contents page of the conspiracy propaganda called The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which was heavily promoted by the Nazis as justification for their actions, its also just for perspective, I’m not trying to promote any of these ideas as legitimate - only that they present a disturbing foil to what’s already going on right now - evil preys on naivety.





If these are conspiracies, why do they now accurately describe the trajectory of the world? Like seriously, what are we supposed to think now, are they just conspiracies still?
The Boomers
Okay so things are getting worse, what now?
If you’re familiar with the study of human consciousness, you know we’re on the cusp of a transformative understanding of our current experiences, their deeper meaning, and the actions we should take. These frameworks can offer insight into the landscape:
- Spiral Dynamics
- Integral Theory (AQAL)
- Psychosocial Development Stages
- Orders of Consciousness, and
- Theory of Ego Development
These are more or less trying to describe the same thing, the theories posit that human consciousness is a spiral, or a structure with levels, and that each level has its own distinct mental model of the world, and itself.





The human journey through consciousness can be mapped into roughly nine progressive levels, each defined by a core objective that drives our thoughts, actions, and growth:
- Survive: Focused on basic needs and immediate safety.
- Connect: Building bonds and relationships for support.
- Control: Seeking power, structure, and authority to navigate the world.
- Belong: Integrating into communities and finding a sense of shared identity (often called the Communitarian level).
- Achieve: Pursuing personal success, goals, and mastery.
- Understand: Gaining deeper knowledge, insight, and self-awareness.
- Harmonise: Aligning with others and the world in balance and empathy.
- Sanctify: Elevating life through purpose, ethics, and spiritual depth.
- Complete: Achieving unity, enlightenment, and transcendence (sometimes known as Nirvana or Christ Consciousness depending on interpretation).
In everyday life, most people in society operate primarily from levels 1 through 4—surviving, connecting, controlling, and belonging. This is the “first half” of the consciousness spiral, where the focus is on external stability and group dynamics rather than profound inner evolution. Enlightened figures like Jesus Christ or the Buddha, by contrast, embodied the pinnacle of the spiral, operating from a state of complete integration and universal compassion - otherwise known as heaven, they don’t see pain.
This stagnation stems from a lack of inner work. Baby Boomers grew up in an era of relative prosperity and stability, often going unchallenged for too long. As a result, many either halted their personal development or never pushed beyond the familiar. They’ve failed to break into the “second half” of the consciousness spiral—levels 5 through 9—where true achievement, understanding, harmony, sanctity, and completion foster innovation, empathy, and global stewardship. Instead of evolving as a cohort to at least level 5 or higher, they’re stuck directing society from outdated paradigms of control and belonging.
Essentially, our societal leaders operate from the Belong (level 4) rung of consciousness, championing communal harmony where “everyone can be friends and fit in and belong” feels like a natural extension of shared identity. Yet they guide a majority populace anchored in Control (level 3), where security demands enforced inclusion through structures and subtle coercion: “Join us, or else.” So there is now a large population reasonably onboard with insane Globalist-Marxist beliefs, and will enforce them forcibly from Control (level 3), but its killing our societies.
This is where these frameworks can be useful in understanding our predicament. Carl Jung believed that “the meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed.” He viewed marriage as a crucible, a vessel strong enough to contain the intense energy of personal alchemy, fostering profound transformation for both partners. If you are not functionally allowed to leave this person, becoming better in order to get along with them is necessary to survive, that’s what Jung means by this. Marriage is the perfect place to fix childhood traumas, negative beliefs, fears and doubts. Women can adjust their Animus complex with their husband, and men their Anima complex with their wife. Marriage through these frameworks essentially becomes a method of growing your consciousness. If the Baby Boomer cohort for the most part have had mostly poor marriages, I believe it means for the most part, they haven’t had the chance to grow into the higher rungs of consciousness. Very general, but you can see the mechanic at play.
The sex, drugs, and rock and roll kids, for the most part, ended up being complete losers. Spouting Marxist filth, dishonouring their religious heritage, immigrating foreigners in a demonstration of how virtuous they are, demolishing beauty and erecting futuristic Jetsons-brutalist slop. Partook in open sex pits at Woodstock, refused to fight for their countries, refused to make sacrifices and take family seriously, is just cringe, degenerate, and seriously dangerous, it was never cool. Never.
(I love my mum thank you for reading, you are a complete anomaly of femininity)
Over the last couple decades this mentality and its effects can be seen in the slew of sex-based crimes in England. High profile cases like Jimmy Saville, and decades of industrial Pakistani rape gangs praying specially on young white girls, where the press, the government, and the police all knew and chose not to act out of fear of race-based retaliation. Recently, a 23 year old Ukrainian war refugee, Iryna Zarutska, was stabbed three times fatally on a train in North Carolina. The West, one of the most feminist/feminised societies ever, has hit the point, where we can’t even protect our own children, or the women that flee to our countries as legitimate war refugees.

Know that these issues are now yours to solve because more or less, the Baby Boomers are just smaller people than a lot of us, that’s why they hide. They grew up in a time of constant bombardment of potential nuclear annihilation, and grew a thick flippant attitude to the deeper things in life. Imagine what Nuke drills at school would do to a child’s perception of how quickly things can be changed or taken from them. They grew up in a time of complete civilizational success: one of the purest dating markets, highly industrialised countries with abundant work and resources, parents and elders that were reliable, wise, and tested, affluent and developed cultures with a firm and honoured connection to the classics of their ancestors, highly religious populations, strong currencies, strong alliances, global peace like never before (albeit with nuclear warheads)…
Think about it, when healthy people get wealthy and fulfilled they turn around and help others. They don’t build a wealth-cocoon around themselves. I saw this dynamic when I was a bartender, the people on drugs (very obvious) are just very happy, very chatty, and just want to share it; when people feel they can connect safely its the only thing they want to do. It’s not in our impulse to be that selfish unless you are in survival mode. You can’t solve a problem with the same brain that created it, because it didn’t see it as an issue to begin with. It’s about perception, they aren’t developed or integrated enough as people, to see why the way they (and their parents, the arch-Boomers) want both their lives and thus society to operate is profoundly short-sighted and destructive - the definition of a luxury belief, and I would bet their average experience of life, at least as a generation, is the opposite of luxurious, they probably hate themselves.










The padding, between these people, and the real societies they have managed (their luxury beliefs) is quickly wearing away. It’s becoming very difficult for them to hide the destruction and chaos with the typical luciferian-feminine-lizard-tongue drivel. Unfortunately, at the point it becomes obvious to the majority of the population that they are just straight liars, they’ve hit proper engagement stages of their world domination plans, and we’ve hit the breaking point as civilisations.

Civil War
One of the largest problems in our societies right now is access to pure, up-to-date information. In a faltering modern society, there is just too much going on financially, politically, and legally, to fully attend to them all as a diligent citizen. The digital regime that formed during COVID in many western countries is truly horrifying to see, and is a functional part of a cultural subversion, you aren’t supposed to know its going on. Dissidents and challenging conversations removed from social media platforms, their banks blocked and locked, their google accounts removed (and with it, access to everything they log in to using google auth), and whistle-blowers locked up and treated like criminals (e.g. Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, David McBride, Richard Boyle, Witness K, Frances Haugen, Daniel Hale, Chris Wylie, Ross Alderson etc...).
David Betz, a professor of War Studies at King’s College London, and one of the foremost academic experts on civil war, insurgency, and counterinsurgency, has gone public recently with his dire warning that “Civil war in the West is practically inevitable” and “The opportunity to prevent civil war is gone; we must now focus on mitigation.”
He’s written and spoken a lot about this, so here are a few key quotes from the last couple years:
- 2023 - “Savagery will return—famine, destruction of shelter, and other coercive tactics will be used.”
- 2023 - “The coming conflict will feature a hi-lo mix of weapons—drones and cyberattacks alongside knives and improvised bombs.”
- 2025 - “Britain and France are the most likely to go first, with the US not far behind.”
- 2025 - “The main threat to the security and prosperity of the West is no longer from outside but within.”
- 2025 - “Multiculturalism is the sweet spot for civil war.”
- 2025 - “Feral cities are the most likely battlegrounds, with urban.” infrastructure as a prime target.”
What is a Civil War?
I’m going to be sort here, but there is some debate about what exactly constitutes a Civil War. Here are the most concrete examples of a Civil War in form:
- Two Factions, Same Sovereign Entity - Combatants must be from the same country, previously under the same sovereign authority/government.
- Government and Military as Combatants - Typically, one side is the government or state, often involving its military, fighting non-state actors.
- Intensity (Casualty Threshold) - Often requires at least 1,000 battle-related deaths, sometimes with annual thresholds.
- Organisation - Both sides must be organised, with the state typically having military force.
- Political Objectives - Conflict must aim for control of government, territorial autonomy, or major policy changes.
- Territorial Control (Optional) - Insurgents may need to control part of the territory and exercise authority, some some definitions.
Predictors of Civil War
Anocracy - a state in the transitional space between democracy and autocracy, often characterised by weak governance and political instability, is highly vulnerable to civil war.
The University of Gothenburg’s Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) research project’s primary purpose is to comprehensively measure and analyse the quality and variations of democratic governance across countries. Both the US and UK have seen notable slides in the recent decade, with their Liberal Democracy Index (LDI) scores declining substantially to 0.75 in 2024—from 0.82 for the US and 0.83 for the UK in 2014—reflecting erosion in liberal components like judicial independence and media freedom, and raising concerns about hybrid regime tendencies if trends persist.
Factionalism - The emergence of identity-based political factions, often along ethic, racial, or religious lines, increases the risk of civil war by fostering division and intransigence.
- Downgrading (Loss of status) - The perceived or real decline in status of a formerly dominant group, often a majority, fuels resentment and can trigger violent conflict.
From Michael Thogo’s Tiktok
- Loss of Faith in Society - A widespread loss of trust in institutions, social cohesion, and the possibility of change through political means, particularly among younger generations, creates conditions ripe for civil conflict.
Where Good People Come In
All of that is probably a little confronting, and good, get used to it, I really don’t believe its going anywhere. Even so, with all this in mind, and it is a lot, I don’t accept any of this, I’m not living with this, I’m not letting this exist, not while I do. I recognise this is all profoundly evil, but its still up to us to continue life, to continue to find beauty, truth, and love in this world.
If you’re young and wondering what to do first, take time to grieve, don’t let yourself walk past the deep feelings of betrayal and danger these people have put us in, they are very real, but be reminded that anger is jet fuel, it can be useful for a boost, but don’t use it all the time or it ruins the engine entirely - we’re not built for it. Once you can sit in the anger, frustration, isolation, loneliness, scarcity, pain, or just general not-enoughness without trying to do anything with it, associating with it, or trying to change it - it will pass, what you focus on grows, attention IS energy, focus on the good in life.
Remember the Boomers’ operate in fear, not love - operate in love. You’ve hurt people in pain or fear or hunger or sadness before. They’ve given us a lot too, if not a clean slate. Forgiveness isn’t some dainty old fashioned practice, its a fucking flame thrower, everything burns - let it go - and if that doesn’t work, why are you still holding on?
Be aware: we’ll be battling the most totalising machine of oppression and dehumanisation humanity has ever built. In a society that worships Marxism, feminism-as-dogma, idol-worship, mediocrity, lies, gossip, disposable brutalist slop, and non-stop salacious sleaze, what do they really have to threaten you with? What do you still have left?
Isaiah 6:8
Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?” And I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
Psalm 3:7
Arise, Lord! Deliver me, my God! Strike all my enemies on the jaw; break the teeth of the wicked.
And so I’m quite sure that if you found this organically, there’s some resonance between us - lets just say the grown ups are starting to wake up. Thinking of ways to combat and structurally manoeuvre through, or around, these honestly devastating and soul crushing realisations is the challenge of the young modern westerner, male or female.
The next article will contain the rest of this discussion with proposed solutions (at least what my plan is), please engage with the algorithm it all helps and its free.

If you would like to donate feel free to:
Bitcoin Lightning: muchcolon102@walletofsatoshi.com